![]() |
| William Shakespeare (L) & William Wordsworth (R) |
The
works of Shakespeare and Wordsworth are “rocket-boosters” to the brain and
better therapy than self-help books, researchers will say this week.
Scientists,
psychologists and English academics at Liverpool University have found that
reading the works of the Bard and other classical writers has a beneficial
effect on the mind, catches the reader’s attention and triggers moments of
self-reflection.
Using
scanners, they monitored the brain activity of volunteers as they read works by
William Shakespeare, William Wordsworth, T.S Eliot and others.
They
then “translated” the texts into more “straightforward”, modern language and
again monitored the readers’ brains as they read the words.
Scans
showed that the more “challenging” prose and poetry set off far more electrical
activity in the brain than the more pedestrian versions.
Scientists
were able to study the brain activity as it responded to each word and record
how it “lit up” as the readers encountered unusual words, surprising phrases or
difficult sentence structure.
This
“lighting up” of the mind lasts longer than the initial electrical spark,
shifting the brain to a higher gear, encouraging further reading.
The
research also found that reading poetry, in particular, increases activity in
the right hemisphere of the brain, an area concerned with “autobiographical
memory”, helping the reader to reflect on and reappraise their own experiences
in light of what they have read. The academics said this meant the classics
were more useful than self-help books.
Philip
Davis, an English professor who has worked on the study with the university’s
magnetic resonance centre, will tell a conference this week: “Serious literature
acts like a rocket-booster to the brain.
"The
research shows the power of literature to shift mental pathways, to create new
thoughts, shapes and connections in the young and the staid alike.”
In
the first part of the research, the brain activity of 30 volunteers was
monitored as they read passages from Shakespeare plays, including King Lear,
Othello, Coriolanus and Macbeth, and again as they read the text rewritten in
simpler form.
While
reading the plain text, normal levels of electrical activity were displayed in
their brains. When they read Shakespeare, however, the levels of activity
“jumped” because of his use of words which were unfamiliar to the readers.
Scans
of brain activity during reading show heightened electrical activity when faced
with 'challenging' texts by great writers
In
one example, volunteers read a line from King Lear: “A father and a gracious
aged man: him have you madded”. They then read a simpler version: “A father and
a gracious aged man: him you have enraged.”
Shakespeare’s
use of the adjective “mad” as a verb sparked a higher level of brain activity
than the straightforward prose.
The
study went on to test how long the effect lasted. It found that the “peak”
triggered by the unfamiliar word was sustained onto the following phrases,
suggesting the striking word had hooked the reader, with their mind “primed for
more attention”.
Working
with psychologists at the university, the next phase of the research is looking
at the extent to which poetry can provide therapeutic benefit, using the work
of, among others William Wordsworth, Henry Vaughan, John Donne, Elizabeth
Barrett Browning, T.S. Eliot, Philip Larkin and Ted Hughes.
Volunteers
brains have been scanned while reading four lines by Wordsworth: “She lived
unknown and few could know, when Lucy ceased to be. But she is in her grave and
oh, the difference to me.”
Four
“translated” lines were also provided: “She lived a lonely life in the country,
and nobody seems to know or care, but now she is dead, and I feel her loss.”
The
first version caused a greater degree of brain activity, lighting up not only
the left part of the brain concerned with language, but also the right
hemisphere that relates to autobiographical memory and emotion.
The
brain shows minimal activity when the text is translated into 'modern' prose
Intense
activity is this area of the brain suggests that the poetry triggers
“reappraisal mechanisms” causing the reader to reflect and rethink their own
experiences in light of what they read.
“Poetry
is not just a matter of style. It is a matter of deep versions of experience
that add the emotional and biographical to the cognitive,” said Professor
Davis, who will present the findings at the North of England education
conference in Sheffield next week.
“This
is the argument for serious language in serious literature for serious human
situations, instead of self-help books or the easy reads that merely reinforce
predictable opinions and conventional self-images.”
Professor
Davis hopes to scan the brains of volunteers reading Charles Dickens to test if
revisions the writer made to his prose spark greater brain activity than the
original text.
He
is now working with the charity The Reader Organisation to establish reading
aloud groups in GP drop-in centres, care homes, prisons, libraries, schools and
mother and toddler groups.
Joint
research with University College London will also study the effects of reading
in dementia sufferers.
Julie Henry is Education Correspondent
of the Sunday Telegraph, joining in 2003 from the Times Educational Supplement.
Named specialist writer of the year at the 2005 British Press Awards, she has
written articles and features covering the SATs marking debacle, the shortage
of university places, higher education admission rows, the scramble for good
school places, grammar schools, academies, and changes to exams and the school
curriculum.
(source : telegraph.co.uk)

